

02 apr kl 15:35, 2010
Many skeptics have extrapolated from the high percentage of explained cases (sometimes artificially due to ingrained negative attitudes) to the unexplained cases. That is not the scientific way of doing research. "If we only had more complete data," their argument goes, "we could also explain the rest of the cases. Only insufficient data prevents us from explaining 100% of the reports."Of course, this argument totally ignores the content of the unexplained cases.