

28 jun kl 07:13, 2011
Det borde vara hur lätt som helst att verifiera och med entydiga bevis fastslå hur det amerikanska rymdprogrammet och månlandningarna genomfördes. Så verkar det dessvärre inte vara. Orsakerna förefaller vara:
Min uppfattning är att det kalla kriget påverkade vad man basunerade ut som sanningen från NASA. Ingen tilläts egentligen att verifiera vad som pågick. Inte ens radioamatörer kunde lagligt lyssna på kommunikationen mellan astronauter och markkontroll. De primärdata som länkades via ett australiskt radioteleskop är om jag inte missminner mig som så mycket annat försvunnet. Knepigt värre.
Månsanden och månstenarna kom de verkligen från månen? Varför var Werhner von Braun i Arktis ganska nära inpå första månlandningen? Fanns det möjligen intressanta stenar där uppe i kylan? Stenar som härrörde från månen och som skulle underlätta expeditionerna? Enklare att ta hem material från Arktis än att ödsla vikt och bränsle på att "flyga hem" material. Ja det finns alldeles för många lösa trådar för att man ska kunna svälja den här munsbiten utan vidare.
Hur sannolikt var det att de skulle låta två eller tre astronauter dö i direktsändning? Vad skulle skattebetalarna sagt om ett katastrofalt misslyckande? Vilken effekt hade det fått på det fortsatta Apolloprogrammet? Vad var de verkliga sannolikheterna och möjligheterna att genomföra det som historien hävdar att Apollo 11 gjorde? Dessutom finns hela UFO-frågan och militärens intresse av rymden som dolda dimensioner i detta när vi ska skilja ut sanningar från lögner. Att sprida sanningar och halvsanningar om UFO kopplat till rymdprogrammet har förmodligen tjänat flera syften.
Bland annat att dölja sanningen den verkliga sanningen om UFO och besökarna.
Foto: Wikipedia
06 feb kl 13:29, 2010
03 feb kl 16:28, 2010
78 per cent believe that ‘gods’ were ancient alien visitors: polls. A series of polls conducted by UFOINDIA.org, (website documenting UFO sightings in India and trying to collect information and views on the subject of extraterrestrial life, intelligence and civilizations) has produced some interesting results with up to 98 per cent of those polled believing that intelligent extraterrestrial life does exist.
The other questions asked include whether those polled believed that ancient ‘gods’ were actually advanced extraterrestrial visitors who visited our planet eons ago and were thus considered as gods by the inhabitants of Earth at the time. 78 per cent of those polled believed that they were.
Sixty nine percent of those polled believed that extraterrestrial intelligence is already present on the Earth. Regarding where else in the Solar System life was most likely – 45 per cent say Mars, 32 per cent say Europa (a moon of Jupiter, which has an underground liquid water ocean which contains more water than that present on earth), 17 per cent say Titan ( a moon of Saturn, with a thick atmosphere much like Earth in the primordial days).
Another interesting result is that 51 per cent of those polled believe that intelligent extraterrestrial life that is more advanced technologically than us will also be more spiritually advanced than humans, 10 per cent say that they will not be more spiritually advanced, 10 per cent were undecided and 29 per cent say that technological development and spiritual development are in no way connected to each other.
Compiled by David Stein Källa: The Canadian
Reference: Originally featured in UFO India Round Up Volume 9 Number 37
11 jan kl 15:17, 2010
We have the most incredible witnesses who claim what they have seen is a craft doing exactly what a machine would do. We have fighter pilots. Astronauts, even a man who walked on the moon all claiming that something is here. We have witnesses on their deathbed who have reported spaceships and even the smell of the decaying alien bodies. We have excellent witnesses who have been aboard craft that seem to be solid hardware. We have witnesses who have been harmed by UFOs and have proof of the encounter.
We now know the military was alarmed for a long time at the recording of UFOs visually and on radar at all the major defense facility. These secret documents strongly suggest these object were extremely interested in our atomic bomb build-up and monitored and sometimes interfered with our nuclear missiles. This was not only happening here it was happening around the world. ….UFO bases anyone.
Although the human race hasn't gone to the stars we are ETs. In seventy years we have visited practically every planet in our solar system. We have walked on the moon a few times. We have landed craft on the Mars, Venus, Jupiter, Phobos and Titan. We have sent a message, by way of a space craft, to the stars. We did all of this with chemical rockets. What will the next thousand years bring in this technology?
Over 3700 hundred cases of UFO landings in America alone. The landing were investigated and chemically analyzed with pronounced differences in the soil retention of water. Some of landing sights stay barren for decades. One landings, of several craft, was witnessed by a whole family. They watched as these several craft lifted off of their field and returned to a large mother ship cylinder above.
No other subject has produced so much government subterfuge and contradictions as the UFO subject around the world. Touted as nonsense publicly UFOs were not only thought of as a security threat, before the gag rule was imposed, the first investigation, commission on UFOs, "Project Sign" concluded the best explanation for UFOs was they were "interplanetary craft".
We all know there are similarities between UFOs and the paranormal. We know that similar lights are seen and recorded that do not seem to be planetary craft. Some of what the UFOs seem to do makes you wonder if they aren't paranormal. This reaction, by us humans is so natural it has beenl predicted by visionaries and science fiction writers a like for over half a century i.e. - That alien technology would probably appear to humans as if it was magic.
UFOs have been witnessed and reported by hundreds if not thousands of people in different stages of failure while in flight. We have reports of object with flight characteristics of a troubled aircraft. We have these objects on fire, dropping chemical substance with sounds of grinding machinery and we even have crashes. This continuing example of what seems like failed technology indicates we are dealing with an imperfect but advanced species.
It seems human beings have been called to the stars from the beginning of time. This need may be a part of the human intelligence, a driving force if you will, that can't be squashed even in low budget times. It seems to be part of survival and if you know the universe that need is always right on. Suns die and planets die. If there are intelligence like us they must have looked at the stars and said what is up there ten thousand years ago.
17 nov kl 18:21, 2009
ROME -- A little more than a half-mile from the Vatican, in a square called Campo de' Fiori, stands a large statue of a brooding monk. Few of the shoppers and tourists wandering through the fruit-and-vegetable market below may know his story; he is Giordano Bruno, a Renaissance philosopher, writer and free-thinker who was burned at the stake by the Inquisition in 1600. Among his many heresies was his belief in a "plurality of worlds" -- in extraterrestrial life, in aliens.
Though it's a bit late for Bruno, he might take satisfaction in knowing that this week the Vatican's Pontifical Academy of Sciences is holding its first major conference on astrobiology, the new science that seeks to find life elsewhere in the cosmos and to understand how it began on Earth. Convened on private Vatican grounds in the elegant Casina Pio IV, formerly the pope's villa, the unlikely gathering of prominent scientists and religious leaders shows that some of the most tradition-bound faiths are seriously contemplating the possibility that life exists in myriad forms beyond this planet. Astrobiology has arrived, and religious and social institutions -- even the Vatican -- are taking note.
Father Jose Funes, a Jesuit astronomer, director of the centuries-old Vatican Observatory and a driving force behind the conference, suggested in an interview last year that the possibility of "brother extraterrestrials" poses no problem for Catholic theology. "As a multiplicity of creatures exists on Earth, so there could be other beings, also intelligent, created by God," Funes explained. "This does not conflict with our faith because we cannot put limits on the creative freedom of God."
Bruno might attest, the notion of life beyond Earth does not easily coexist with the "truths" that many people hold dear. Just as the Copernican revolution forced us to understand that Earth is not the center of the universe, the logic of astrobiologists points in a similarly unsettling direction: to the likelihood that we are not alone, and perhaps that we are not even the most advanced creatures in the universe. This may not "conflict with our faith," but it may conflict with the stories we tell about who and what we are.
The Vatican's five-day conference is chaired by the religious leader of the highly regarded Academy, Bishop Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo. Scientists (many of them nonbelievers) are offering presentations on subjects as varied as how life might have begun on Earth; what newly found "extremophile" microbes living in harsh places on our planet might tell us about possible life on others; and how life forms might be detected in our solar system, or how their bio-signatures might be found on and around the many distant exoplanets.
Having overcome the giggle factor of most things extraterrestrial, astrobiologists are telling a scientific story to an audience that may someday use it to defend -- or enhance -- its faith.
The Catholic Church isn't the only institution preparing itself for what could be a world-changing event. For instance, NASA's National Astrobiology Institute, established in 1998, sponsored a meeting of scientists, ethicists, religious leaders and philosophers in February to brainstorm about the societal implications of astrobiology, and it is preparing a semiofficial "road map" of sensitive issues we'd need to address should the presence of life elsewhere be established.
Initial extraterrestrial discoveries -- which many scientists believe are on the horizon, if not yet in reach -- are likely to be of microbial life just below the parched surface of Mars, in the waters of Jupiter's moon Europa under its thick crust of ice or in the liquid plumes of Saturn's moon Enceladus. Though it will be easy to dismiss extraterrestrial microbes as unthreatening to anyone's worldview, cosmologists and astrobiologists generally contend that the existence of two separate geneses in one solar system would enormously increase the probability that life is commonplace in the universe. And as we know, under the right conditions microbes can evolve over eons to become dinosaurs, hummingbirds and us.
The possibility of extraterrestrial life is not much of an issue for Eastern religions, which tend to be less Earth-centric. Islam also has little problem with extraterrestrials because the Koran speaks explicitly of life beyond Earth, as do some newer Christian groups such as Mormons. It is in mainstream Western religious traditions, in which humans and God are central, where astrobiology poses the biggest challenge.
"I think the discovery of a second genesis would be of enormous spiritual significance," says Paul Davies, a theoretical physicist and cosmologist from Arizona State University who is speaking at the Vatican conference. He believes the potential challenge to Christianity in particular "is being downplayed" by religious leaders.
"The real threat would come from the discovery of extraterrestrial intelligence, because if there are beings elsewhere in the universe, then Christians, they're in this horrible bind. They believe that God became incarnate in the form of Jesus Christ in order to save humankind, not dolphins or chimpanzees or little green men on other planets."
Davies explained the tensions within the Catholic Church: "If you look back at the history of Christian debate on this, it divides into two camps. There are those that believe that it is human destiny to bring salvation to the aliens, and those who believe in multiple incarnations," he said, referencing the belief that Christ could have appeared on other planets at other times. "The multiple incarnations is a heresy in Catholicism." (As Giordano Bruno learned.)
Many Protestant scholars agree with Funes, saying that the discovery of extraterrestrial life would not pose a major challenge to their faith or theology, especially if it was not intelligent or morally aware. But on the evangelical side, there is a deep concern, one reminiscent of the battles over evolution. "My theological perspective is that E.T. life would actually make a mockery of the very reason Christ came to die for our sins, for our redemption," Gary Bates, head of Atlanta-based Creation Ministries International, told me recently in a critique of the Vatican conference. Bates believes that "the entire focus of creation is mankind on this Earth" and that intelligent, morally aware extraterrestrial life would undermine that view and belief in the incarnation, resurrection and redemption drama so central to the faith. "It is a huge problem that many Christians have not really thought about," he said.
The big question involves intelligent life. Astronomers say there are something like 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars in the known universe, and more planets are discovered orbiting some of them all the time. (On one day last month, the European Space Agency announced the discovery of 32 new extra-solar planets.) It is increasingly difficult to assume that our sun and planet are the only ones capable of supporting complex and evolved life -- the kind of life that Christians might assume would be in need of salvation. Questions inevitably follow: Are Christianity and, to some extent, other religions only stories about life on Earth? And if they are not "universal" in a cosmic sense, does that diminish their significance?
Thus the conference on astrobiology at the Vatican -- an institution that got Copernicus, Galileo and other men of science wrong and doesn't want to do that again. In the words of Pierre Lena, a French astrophysicist and member of the Pontifical Academy who pressed for the astrobiology conference: "Astrobiology is a mature science that says very interesting things that could change the vision humanity has of itself. The church cannot be indifferent to that."
Funes, an earnest priest-scientist with a wry sense of humor, seemed a bit nonplussed last week about the worldwide attention that his "brother extraterrestrials" comments from last year and the astrobiology conference have drawn. Speaking to me from the new Vatican Observatory headquarters outside Rome -- the church also operates a telescope in Arizona -- he didn't retract his statements or express regret about them, and said he has not been chastised by higher-ups at the Vatican.
But he did emphasize that he was not speaking officially for the church, even though his 2008 interview ran on the front page of the official Vatican newspaper, L'Osservatore Romano. The church, he said, has no official position on extraterrestrial life or on theological issues it might raise. Just as some people write science fiction, Funes said with a mischievous smile, he is attracted to "theological fiction" -- what might become important religiously if life beyond Earth is discovered someday.
"There's no need for the church to speak on this point now," he said. "But yes, that could certainly change."
Marc Kaufman, a science and space reporter for The Washington Post, is on leave writing a book about astrobiology.
Marc Kaufman Sunday, November 8, 2009